Quantcast

About the editconfig in the resent patch in pacman

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

About the editconfig in the resent patch in pacman

tur-users mailing list
>I'd prefer no vim modelines and no editorconfig file.
>
>Allan McRae

So.. you'll accept a patch removing all those modelinal from all the pacman
and makepkg and pacman-contrib and mkinitcpio code or just some parts??
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: About the editconfig in the resent patch in pacman

tur-users mailing list
On 01/07/2017 07:13 PM, Pablo Roberto Lezaeta Reyes via aur-general wrote:
>> I'd prefer no vim modelines and no editorconfig file.
>>
>> Allan McRae
>
> So.. you'll accept a patch removing all those modelinal from all the pacman
> and makepkg and pacman-contrib and mkinitcpio code or just some parts??

This isn't AUR discussion, please take it to pacman-dev and stop
spamming aur-general and breaking conversation flow.

(Also, stop conflating three different software projects only one of
which is actually Allan's responsibility.)

Thanks.

--
Eli Schwartz


signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: About the editconfig in the resent patch in pacman

tur-users mailing list
El 07-01-2017 9:29 PM, "Eli Schwartz via aur-general" <
[hidden email]> escribió:

On 01/07/2017 07:13 PM, Pablo Roberto Lezaeta Reyes via aur-general wrote:
>> I'd prefer no vim modelines and no editorconfig file.
>>
>> Allan McRae
>
> So.. you'll accept a patch removing all those modelinal from all the
pacman
> and makepkg and pacman-contrib and mkinitcpio code or just some parts??

This isn't AUR discussion, please take it to pacman-dev and stop
spamming aur-general and breaking conversation flow.

(Also, stop conflating three different software projects only one of
which is actually Allan's responsibility.)

Thanks.

--
Eli Schwartz


Pacman-dev jthisnot accept my email and the automessage point to post the
message to this list so i just follow the intructions.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: pacman-dev rejected mail Was: About the editconfig in the resent patch in pacman

tur-users mailing list
On 01/08/2017 12:21 AM, Pablo Roberto Lezaeta Reyes via aur-general wrote:
> Pacman-dev jthisnot accept my email and the automessage point to post the
> message to this list so i just follow the intructions.

Have you actually subscribed to pacman-dev?

Otherwise, that is kind of weird, since the Arch Linux mailing lists are
all run by the same software on the same server and presumably with the
same configuration (except for restricting e.g. *posting* to
arch-dev-public to Devs/TUs).

--
Eli Schwartz


signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: pacman-dev rejected mail Was: About the editconfig in the resent patch in pacman

tur-users mailing list
El 08-01-2017 2:54 AM, "Eli Schwartz via aur-general" <
[hidden email]> escribió:

On 01/08/2017 12:21 AM, Pablo Roberto Lezaeta Reyes via aur-general wrote:
> Pacman-dev jthisnot accept my email and the automessage point to post the
> message to this list so i just follow the intructions.

Have you actually subscribed to pacman-dev?

Otherwise, that is kind of weird, since the Arch Linux mailing lists are
all run by the same software on the same server and presumably with the
same configuration (except for restricting e.g. *posting* to
arch-dev-public to Devs/TUs).

--
Eli Schwartz


Yeah i'm subscribed unless i'm mistaking pacman-dev and pacman-dev-request
for the same mailist.
Loading...