Quantcast

Somebody using freetype2-infinality, too?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Somebody using freetype2-infinality, too?

Ralf Mardorf
Hi,

I've got issues with compiling a lot of software. My guess was, that I need to rebuild harfbuzz against freetype2-infinality to get rid of those issues, but actually building harfbuzz failed with the same error as all the other builds do [1]. The culprit seemingly is freetype2-infinality.

I wonder if somebody using freetype2-infinality found a workaround this issue.

Regards,
Ralf

[1]
[rocketmouse@archlinux harfbuzz]$ makepkg -s
==> Making package: harfbuzz 1.4.2-2 (Sat Feb  4 11:00:42 CET 2017)
[snip]
In file included from /usr/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftconfig.h:42:0,
                 from /usr/include/freetype2/freetype/freetype.h:33,
                 from hb-ft.h:35,
                 from test-would-substitute.cc:44:
/usr/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftoption.h:690:0: warning: "TT_CONFIG_OPTION_SUBPIXEL_HINTING" redefined
 #define TT_CONFIG_OPTION_SUBPIXEL_HINTING  ( 1 | 2 )
 
/usr/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftoption.h:689:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
 #define TT_CONFIG_OPTION_SUBPIXEL_HINTING  1
 
  GEN      libharfbuzz.la
libtool:   error: cannot find the library '/usr/lib/libharfbuzz.la' or unhandled argument '/usr/lib/libharfbuzz.la'
make[4]: *** [Makefile:1407: libharfbuzz.la] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory '/tmp/fix/harfbuzz/src/harfbuzz/src'
make[3]: *** [Makefile:2432: all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/fix/harfbuzz/src/harfbuzz/src'
make[2]: *** [Makefile:1325: all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory '/tmp/fix/harfbuzz/src/harfbuzz/src'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:498: all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/fix/harfbuzz/src/harfbuzz'
make: *** [Makefile:430: all] Error 2
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
    Aborting...
[rocketmouse@archlinux harfbuzz]$ pacman -Q freetype2-infinality
freetype2-infinality 2.7.1-1
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Somebody using freetype2-infinality, too?

Justin Dray
I believe infinality is dead now. I saw someone posted the other week about
this new fonts meta package [1] that allows similar things, but all my
remaining arch systems are headless these days, but I would give it a go
rather than infinality now.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fonts-meta-base/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Somebody using freetype2-infinality, too?

tur-users mailing list
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Justin Dray <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I believe infinality is dead now. I saw someone posted the other week about
> this new fonts meta package [1] that allows similar things, but all my
> remaining arch systems are headless these days, but I would give it a go
> rather than infinality now.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fonts-meta-base/

This one can help:
https://gist.github.com/cryzed/e002e7057435f02cc7894b9e748c5671
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Somebody using freetype2-infinality, too?

Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 13:05:11 +0100, SanskritFritz via aur-general wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Justin Dray <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> I believe infinality is dead now. I saw someone posted the other
>> week about this new fonts meta package [1] that allows similar
>> things, but all my remaining arch systems are headless these days,
>> but I would give it a go rather than infinality now.
>>
>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fonts-meta-base/ 

Thanks, for the moment I'll go with fonts-meta-base.

>This one can help:
>https://gist.github.com/cryzed/e002e7057435f02cc7894b9e748c5671
Loading...